Monday, February 13, 2012

Drexel 78, Hofstra 67 (Or: Who would have thought they’d end up this way, getting so close, so far away)

Philadelphia's finest musical export summed up the 2011-12 Flying Dutchmen way back during my senior year of high school, when me and Nathaniel Lester formed a dynamic duo in pickup basketball!

Mike Moore did a fine job of spelling out the absurdity of a double-digit loss to Georgia State nine days ago, when the Panthers routed the Flying Dutchmen even tough the Dutchmen had as many assists and steals, two fewer rebounds and seven fewer turnovers than the victors.

Even in this ridiculous Dutchmen season, that seemed to be bottom, at least in terms of head-scratching losses that simply don’t add up on paper. But as usual, we were wrong. Very, very wrong.

The Dutchmen managed to never lead in a 78-67 loss to Drexel at the cozy DAC in Philadelphia Saturday even though they forced 11 more turnovers (18) than they committed (seven). It was just the sixth time since joining the CAA that Hofstra has had a turnover ratio of plus-10 and the first time the Dutchmen have lost such a game. Their average margin of victory in the first five such instances: 15 points.

“If I could cover the numbers up and say, hey, we got 19 offensive rebounds and only turned it over seven times and they turned it over 18 times, I’d probably sit here and tell you we probably would have won the game,” Cassara said.

So how did THIS—so close, so far away—happen again? Well, for one thing, the Dutchmen had so many offensive rebounds because they missed 43 of their 64 shots. And while Moore, Nathaniel Lester, Stephen Nwaukoni and Shemiye McLendon combined to shoot a respectable 20-of-46 from the field, the rest of the team was a gasp-worthy 1-of-18.

“Our issue just continues to be we weren’t able to make enough baskets to win,” Cassara said. “We had a lot of great opportunities around the basket tonight and we weren’t able to execute.”

Drexel, on the other hand, executed. Over and over and over again. The Dragons shot a blistering 59.6 percent, the highest a CAA opponent has ever shot against the Dutchmen, per EvanJ at the CAA Zone. Drexel’s three double-digit scorers—Chris Fouch, Frantz Massenat and Damian Lee—were a silly 22-of-29 from the field. Fouch lived up to his “F-Bomb” nickname by hitting three free throws less than three minutes into the second half to start the Dragons’ decisive 25-8 run and by draining his first six 3-point attempts of the second half.

Only these Dutchmen—who have as many non-conference wins over opponents in the top 100 as they do CAA wins—could produce such diametrically opposite historic efforts in the same game.

“I told the team: It’s a mental mistake every game,” Cassara said. “It’s a little mental breakdown. And I think that just comes from fatigue and just comes from we don’t have enough mental toughness to say ‘Hey, I’m not going to foul a jump shooter’ [or] ‘Hey, I’m not going to go underneath the screen’ or ‘Hey, I’m going to cut a little harder on offense.’ And part of that, to me, is from fatigue.”

Yet despite the almost uninterrupted spate of losing and an undermanned roster (which got even lighter when David Imes sat out the second half with a groin injury that has him very questionable at best for this week), the Dutchmen continued to exhibit an admirable amount of hustle and effort. They forced a seemingly unprecedented seven held balls in the first half, during which they fell behind by 10 less than six minutes in yet closed the gap to two at the under-4 timeout.

The Dutchmen opened the second half by outscoring the Dragons 10-4 to pull within two points—and missed two chances to tie the game a bit more than two minutes into the half—and went on a 20-9 run to pull within eight points at the final media timeout.

“I thought our effort and our intensity was really, really solid,” Cassara said. “Proud of our guys. We continue to play hard. We just haven’t been able to make enough winning plays to beat a team like Drexel, especially down here at Drexel.”

Nobody played harder than Lester, who continued to produce a sensational finish to what was already a very solid senior season by scoring a game-high 27 points—including 22 in the second half—to go along with a team-high eight rebounds, including seven on the offensive end. Effort has never been an issue for Lester, but he is embodying the senior playing with more passion than ever in February, putting teammates on his back and doing all he can to will a flawed team to extend his career just a little bit longer.

“Nat plays hard—he plays hard,” Cassara said. “He plays hard and he’s given us all he’s got. He continues to play really hard and give us a lot of energy.”

There were some other notable individual efforts by Dutchmen, many of which were alternately—and appropriately—impressive and cringe-worthy. The best overall performance, other than Lester, came from Nwaukoni, who was 4-of-6 from the field in scoring eight points for the second straight game. The Dutchmen will need him to continue finding his early January form with Imes banged up.

Dwan McMillan fashioned a magnificent assist-to-turnover ratio of 6:1, but was 0-for-4 from the field. Moore had 18 points and became only the second player in school history to score 1,000 points in two seasons after transferring to Hofstra, but lapsed into inconsistency and sat for almost five minutes during Drexel’s big second half run.

And Stevie Mejia had five steals, and nearly had a couple more that he couldn’t quite corral, but was 0-for-8 from the field three days after he was 5-of-11 against George Mason.

“Wayne Morgan said to me walking down the tunnel at halftime ‘That’s the guy that you told me could really guard the ball that we’ve been waiting to see,’” Cassara said. “He’s starting to come along. That’s a positive note. Got to keep trying to build on the positives. We’ve got three of our next four games at home.”

There aren’t too many of those on the scoreboard or in the standings—the last time the Dutchmen were 2-13 in conference play, the 13th loss was a season-ender in the 1988 East Coast Conference tournament—and even the schedule that once seemed to lighten up in mid-February has turned difficult.

Delaware, which started this Dutchmen funk with a one-point win in New-ARK Jan. 4, visits Wednesday in the midst of a four-game winning streak that has made the Blue Hens the hottest team outside of the top four. Then there’s the too-meaningless-for-words “Bracket Buster” against Siena Saturday, followed by a trip to William & Mary—which scorched Northeastern Saturday to break a 10th-place tie with the Dutchmen—and the Senior Day finale against UNC Wilmington.

But Cassara will work as hard leading into games as the Dutchmen work during them, hoping to fix whatever ails the Dutchmen and get to the point where luck finally turns their way, the shots start falling, the math finally works in their favor and so close is no longer so far away.

“I’ve been on some teams that [didn’t] have winning records and some of those teams didn’t play hard this time of year,” Cassara said. “That team out there played hard today. We played hard. We just aren’t able to make enough winning plays to win a game like that on the road yet. So we have to keep trying to look at some of the things that [are] prohibiting us from doing that and stay positive. We head home for three of our next four and we’re going to go back to practice [Sunday] and try to get better Sunday and Monday and play Delaware on Tuesday.”

3 STARS OF THE GAME (vs. Drexel, 2/11)
3: Nathaniel Lester
2: Stephen Nwaukoni
1: Mike Moore

SEASON STANDINGS
Mike Moore 56
Nathaniel Lester 41
Dwan McMillan 17
David Imes 14
Stephen Nwaukoni 10
Stevie Mejia 9
Shemiye McLendon 9
Moussa Kone 3
Bryant Crowder 2
Matt Grogan 1

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

George Mason 72, Hofstra 62 (Or: All around the CAA, same song)

Sing it Humpty! (No not the guy from James Madison)

Sorry for the delay here. Buried in work during the latter part of the week and whatever free time I had was spent on a longer-term project, the results of which you will hopefully see here in the next couple weeks. Intrigued? Good! Anyway the Dutchmen tip off against Drexel in a little more than four hours so here’s a quick buffet of thoughts from the 72-62 loss to George Mason (i.e. The Bad Guys):

1.) It’s just the same ol’ situation for the Flying Dutchmen, who took a 56-54 lead on Nathaniel Lester’s old-fashioned 3-point play with 5:52 left and appeared to have all the momentum after Mike Morrison (snicker snicker snort snort) picked up a technical foul for mouthing off (as always, you can take the Larranaga out of Fairfax, but not the Larranaga out of his players). But yet another awful #CAAHoops officiating crew inexplicably handed out off-setting technicals, with Stevie Mejia picking one up as well, and George Mason outscored the Dutchmen 18-6 the rest of the way.

Sherrod Wright, whose traditional (yay for synonyms!) 3-point play in Hempstead gave the Patriots the lead for good with less than two minutes to play two weeks earlier, once again delivered the dagger with a 3-pointer immediately after Lester gave the Dutchmen the lead. It was yet another example of the Dutchmen running out of gas at the end of an otherwise fine defensive performance: While the Dutchmen held the Patriots scoreless from the field during the last 10 possessions of the first half, Mason scored on nine of its last 11 second half possessions. Well, technically it was nine of 12, but with Larranaga gone, Ryan Pearson didn’t call timeout after stealing the ball at midcourt in the waning seconds so that he could set up another 3-pointer. Progress!

2.) This marks the sixth time in CAA play the Dutchmen have lost a game in which they led or were tied with less than eight minutes to go. Less painful than leading Mason, James Madison and Northeastern with less than two minutes to play at home, perhaps, and certainly less painful than squandering a chance to take the lead against Delaware with free throws in the final 20 seconds in Newark, but still, in a season filled with near-misses, leading one of the CAA’s tri-leaders in the final six minutes on the road stung.

3.) Like the other near-misses, there were some reasons for optimism to be found in the defeat. In addition to the usual resiliency displayed by the Dutchmen, Stevie Mejia (11 points on 5-of-11 shooting) had perhaps his best and most inspired game of the year as the Dutchmen finally had somebody other than Lester and Mike Moore to shoulder some of the offensive load. Mejia played his most minutes (27) since Nov. 25 and scored his most points since Nov. 26, which, not coincidentally, were the two games just before he suffered that lingering hamstring injury against Boston University. Lester (14 points) scored in double figures for the 22nd time this year, matching his career total entering the season. Stephen Nwaukoni (eight points, eight rebounds and three steals) snapped out of his recent slump as well by scoring his most points since Jan. 11 and pulling down his most boards since Jan. 14. And the Dutchmen were an impressive 19-of-21 from the free throw line.

4.) But all but two of Nwaukoni’s points came from the free throw line as he and fellow starters David Imes and Dwan McMillan combined to shoot just 4-of-16 from the field. Imes played just 18 minutes, only the second time this year he’s failed to play at least 20 minutes, and made two or fewer field goals for the third straight game. McMillan had five assists but was just 1-of-7 from the field and is 4-of-25 from the field in the last six games. And Mejia accounted for all but two of the Dutchmen’s bench points while Mason’s depth (32 bench points) once again wore down the Dutchmen.

5.) And while Moore scored a game-high 18 points, he scored his final points with 9:44 left and took his last field goal attempt with 10:54 to go. The Dutchmen scored on just three of their final nine possessions following Lester’s go-ahead points. Moore needs to be more involved late and Imes, in particular, has to get untracked in order for the Dutchmen to have any hope of ending their string of gut-wrenching conference losses and to construct a bit of a run in the CAA Tournament three weeks from now.

3 STARS OF THE GAME (vs. George Mason, 2/8)
3: Stevie Mejia
2: Mike Moore
1: Nathaniel Lester

SEASON STANDINGS
Mike Moore 55
Nathaniel Lester 38
Dwan McMillan 17
David Imes 14
Stevie Mejia 9
Shemiye McLendon 9
Stephen Nwaukoni 8
Moussa Kone 3
Bryant Crowder 2
Matt Grogan 1

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

In which I cry for help by picking through the trail mix and coming up with optimistic CAA Tournament possibilities for the Dutchmen

Mmm. Those pineapple bits and the Dutchmen's CAA Tournament hopes look...so....*gulp*...good.

When it comes to anticipation-filled Februarys, we’ve had it pretty good here since I foisted Defiantly Dutch upon the world prior to the 2008-09 season. Three years ago, the Dutchmen remained in contention for a Friday bye until the waning moments of the season (a feat which, in retrospect, probably should have been enough to get Charles Jenkins’ jersey retired as a sophomore). Two years ago, the Dutchmen’s hopes for a bye were extinguished by the end of January thanks to a 2-7 start, but an 8-1 finish raised hopes they could beat the odds and emerge from Friday to win the title on Monday. And last year, of course, was the year Jenkins took over the world and locked up a bye shortly after Valentine’s Day.

So on one hand, enduring a season like this—in which we are left to ponder which seeding and potential Friday matchup gives the Dutchmen the best chance of winning a game or two OR FOUR—is a reminder of how fortunate we have been and to appreciate the good times because you never know when you’re going to be 2-11 the day before the Super Bowl.

On the other hand, it kinda sucks, and is pretty much the equivalent of sifting through trail mix after all the peanuts, raisins and imitation M&Ms have been consumed. (You, on the other hand, may like almonds, cashews, sunflower seeds and other silly healthy stuff, so your mileage on this analogy may vary) Sure, you’ll manage to spin what you find as delicious, or at least edible. But really, it’s not very good at all.

But we can’t help it that the fates are kicking Hofstra’s ass this year and that Drexel, George Mason, VCU, Old Dominion and Georgia State are hoarding all the good trail mix, so here we are: Five games and a blasted Bracket Buster to go in the regular season and hanging on to whatever shreds of desperate optimism and funky, convoluted, bottom-feeder tiebreaker scenarios we can muster. Like these!

—First of all, any hope the Dutchmen have of playing beyond Friday rests on avoiding VCU or Georgia State like the plague. The Rams and Panthers have handed the Dutchmen all three of their double-digit CAA losses and swarming defenses are just terrible matchups for the Dutchmen.

Fortunately, the standings seem likely to shake out so that the Dutchmen avoid either squad on Friday. The Dutchmen are almost certain to avoid last place—and a noontime date with the fifth seed—thanks to their win over Towson.

VCU is tied for first place and the Rams need just one more win to assure no worse than a fifth-place finish. Georgia State is currently in fifth and is well-positioned to finish no lower with a schedule that includes home games against Northeastern, Delaware and Old Dominion, all of whom are over. 500 in CAA play, and roadies at sub-.500 James Madison and William & Mary. The Panthers can all but assure they finish at least fifth by beating Northeastern and Delaware this week, wins which would put the Fighting Ron Hunters at least two games ahead of both squads with three to play.

—As of this typing, the Dutchmen can finish no higher than seventh. But they will be eliminated from seventh-place contention with another win by Delaware or another loss by the Dutchmen. So let’s just assume that’s going to happen and concentrate on eighth through 11th place.

—History suggests 10th or 11th is the best place to finish for a sub-.500 team hoping to salvage some—wait for it—pride with a tournament run. The 11th seed has won its opening round game in each of the last three seasons and a double-digit seed has won at least one game in the tournament in four of the six seasons since the CAA expanded to 12 teams.

And since the first round of expansion in 2001-02, only three teams seeded in the bottom half of the tournament have advanced to the semifinals. Two of those—10th-seeded Hofstra in 2002 and 11th-seeded Towson in 2009—were double-digit seeds. So you’re saying there’s a chance…

It makes sense that the 10th and 11th seeds have a better chance at making a bit of a run. Those seeds are on the opposite side of the bracket from the top seed, so the 10th or 11th seed can’t face the favorite until the final. And the less distance there is between seeds, the more even the matchup. An 11 over a 6 is a legit upset, but a 10 vs. 7 game is closing in on a toss-up.

In addition, each of the last two teams to win as the 11th seed were expected to fare far better but endured a season filled with rotten luck. William & Mary was picked to finish eighth last year but lost seven CAA games by six points or less (gee, sound familiar?). Two years ago, James Madison was predicted to finish fifth but suffered a spate of injuries and lost seven CAA games by six points or less (I swear I am not making this up—go look here).

—So what are the odds the Dutchmen finish 10th or 11th? Right now, they technically hold the 10th seed over William & Mary thanks to a higher RPI. The Dutchmen and the Fighting Bill Lawrences will likely decide who finishes 11th when they face each other for the only time this season Feb. 22.

But can the Dutchmen finish higher—and end up in that purgatory that is eighth or ninth, where a win on Friday means a quarterfinal game with the top seed 24 hours later?

My guess is the Dutchmen go 3-2 in their final five CAA games and finish 5-13. I’m still convinced the Dutchmen will beat one of the top teams in the league, which means I’m still convinced they’re going to do no worse than split on the road with George Mason and Drexel this week. Hi, Jerry Beach, Perpetual Optimist!

Even if the Dutchmen get swept this week, Delaware—which, as you no doubt remember, beat the Dutchmen by one point in Delaware in a game in which the Blue Hens never trailed—presents another potentially winnable game for Hofstra. I’m also assuming wins over William & Mary and UNC Wilmington, the latter in the Senior Day home finale (the Dutchmen haven’t lost a Senior Day game since 1995-96—MY senior year, for God’s sake).

—Would the Dutchmen lose by winning? Odds are a 5-13 finish would catapult the Dutchmen into a tie for ninth with James Madison—a tie the Dutchmen would win.

James Madison (3-10) has two games left against Towson, two games against Drexel and one against Georgia State. While there’s no telling what the unpredictable Dukes will do, let’s assume they sweep the Tigers and lose the other three. The Dutchmen and Dukes split the season series, but if the two teams end up tied at 5-13, the Dutchmen would almost surely win the second tiebreaker and the higher seed by having beaten a higher-seeded team than James Madison, whose five wins in this scenario would all come against teams finishing eighth or lower.

—However, all hope of finishing 10th is not lost if the Dutchmen finish 5-13. UNC Wilmington (5-8) could fall into a three-way logjam for the eighth through 10th seeds if it loses its final five games. And that’s certainly possible: The Seahawks are reeling, with seven losses in their last nine games and freshman starter K.K. Simmons suspended indefinitely. And their schedule is plenty challenging: UNC Wilmington hosts co-leaders George Mason and VCU and visits Delaware, Old Dominion and Hofstra down the stretch.

A three-way tie between the Dutchmen, James Madison and UNC Wilmington would be broken first by their composite records against each other. James Madison (2-1 with a win over UNC Wilmington) would take the eighth seed over the Dutchmen (2-2) and UNC Wilmington (1-2), at which point the two-way tiebreaker would be used to settle the Hofstra-UNC Wilmington deadlock.

The two teams split with each other under this scenario, but as long as the Dutchmen don’t beat Mason or Drexel, the Seahawks would almost certainly win the tiebreaker thanks to having more wins over teams ahead of them in the standings than the Dutchmen. While the Seahawks and Dutchmen would each have a win over Delaware, the Seahawks’ win over Northeastern would catapult them into ninth—and leave Hofstra in 10th, where it can quietly lurk before embarking upon the greatest comeback in CAA history.

There you go. Simple, right? And don’t worry. If the Dutchmen finish eighth or ninth—either because I miscalculated my tiebreaker scenarios or because they show blatant disregard for my late-night work by winning their way into the higher seed—well, then I will come up with reasons why those trail mix remnants are the tastiest ever.

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Monday, February 6, 2012

Georgia State 59, Hofstra 43 (Or: All they want is some remedy)

The second-best Georgia band to have a top-two album in 1992 ponders the fate of the 2011-12 Flying Dutchmen!

After 17 defeats, the Flying Dutchmen are running out of different verbiage to explain the same thing. So on Saturday, Mike Moore just stated the obvious.

“I look at these stats and nothing really stands out,” Moore said after the Dutchmen fell to Georgia State, 59-43, in a game that was both closer than it looked and exactly as lopsided as it looked, all at the same time. “We played them pretty even: Assists, steals, turnovers. They had 17 [turnovers], we only had 10. The only thing is the point category. We’re not scoring. And that’s the problem.

“I feel like we’re matched up just as well as they were, with everything top to bottom except the point category. And that’s what wins games at the end of the day.”

And at the end of Saturday the Dutchmen were 2-11 and still tied for 10th place in the CAA despite, as Moore noted, playing Georgia State to a tie in assists (14) and steals (seven). But while Moore and Nathaniel Lester combined for 27 points, only two fewer than Georgia State’s top-scoring combination of Devonta White and Ali Jihad, the Panthers had two more players in double figures while the only additional Dutchmen player to even get halfway to 10 points was Moussa Kone.

The Dutchmen had four fewer field goals (17) than Georgia State on 17 more shots (58). Furthermore, while Moore and Lester were 11-of-31 from the field, the rest of their teammates were 6-for-27 against Georgia State’s frantic and varied mix of defensive alignments. The Dutchmen were just 3-of-22 from 3-point land and 6-of-12 from the free throw line.

“Tough to win any game at home this time of year against a team in the top part of the league when we shoot 3-of-22 and 6-of-12,” Mo Cassara said. “It’s one of those days the ball didn’t go in the basket.”

Of course, the Dutchmen have had a lot of those days since CAA play began. While the Dutchmen are a middle-of-the-pack team scoring overall among CAA teams (seventh at 64.4 points per game), they have been ice cold for most of the conference season. The Dutchmen are ninth in scoring in CAA play (60.0 ppg), 11th in field goal percentage (39 percent) and last in 3-point field goal percentage (26 percent).

With Moore and Lester, the Dutchmen have as good a 1-2 combination as anyone in the league. Only two other teams (James Madison and UNC Wilmington) have two players in the top 10 in scoring overall and only James Madison has two players in the top 10 in scoring in CAA games.

But the Dutchmen have had just two players in double figures in seven of the last eight games and Moore and Lester have been those two six times. The only time in this stretch in which the Dutchmen had three players score at least 10 points was the win against James Madison.

The Dutchmen’s other three starters—David Imes, Stephen Nwaukoni and Dwan McMillan—were all 3-of-12 from the field, with one field goal apiece, for the second straight game. And in their last two games, the Dutchmen’s third-leading scorer is walk-on Matt Grogan (nine points).

Yet as frigid as the Dutchmen were Saturday, they were, as they have been in just about every CAA games this season, one basket away from making things very interesting. Georgia State raced out to a 19-point lead late in the first half—the second time in as many games a Ron Hunter-coached team has scorched the Dutchmen and led by 19 points in the first half, hello 2010 CBI—but the Dutchmen crawled back within seven midway through the second half.

Over the next three scoreless minutes, the Dutchmen missed three shots to pull within four or five. On the last miss, Stevie Mejia missed a fast break layup and Rashaad Richardson drained a 3-pointer at the other end to begin a game-ending 13-4 “run” by the Panthers, whose lead never again slipped into single digits.

“I thought we had a pretty positive comeback,” Cassara said. “I think we had a chance to cut the game to five with several minutes to go. We cut the game to five, set our defense, I think the whole thing changes. The pressure goes back to their bench.

“But, again, it’s kind of been the story of our season that way. It becomes a very fine line and one or two possessions really dictates what happens to us.”

Cassara could take solace in the resiliency the Dutchmen displayed during the comeback as well as the gritty efforts of both Lester and Moore, each of whom played with a passion befitting two seniors in the final month of their collegiate careers.

Despite taking a blow to the face in the first half, Lester willed his way to another double-double with 14 points and a game-high 10 rebounds. Moore overcame a slow start—he didn’t score his first basket until the final minute of the first half—to finish with 13 points, including 11 of the Dutchmen’s first 15 in the second half, and had three assists, including a nifty dish to Kone for a layup that pulled the Dutchmen within 10 points for the first time in the second half.

“Personally, I want to go out winning,” Moore said. “I was hoping that we could come out and win this game. But the ball didn’t bounce our way going in the hoop.”

And while Kone (2-of-2 from the field, two blocks, two steals in 21 minutes) managed to crack a Georgia State interior that blocked eight shots, including six by Eric Buckner, and was otherwise unyielding against the Dutchmen.

“I thought Moussa did a terrific job for us,” Cassara said. “He was very active. Even Mike, coming out of one of the timeouts, said ‘Let’s get Moussa in there’ because he was really active on defense. And I thought he was active on offense as well.”

In the end, though, the result was familiar as the Dutchmen’s imperfections proved too much to overcome. “Georgia State [is] a very good team,” Cassara said. “To beat a good team. We have to be great right now. And that’s what we’re going to keep striving for.”

3 STARS OF THE GAME (vs. Georgia State, 2/4)
3: Nathaniel Lester
2: Mike Moore
1: Moussa Kone

SEASON STANDINGS
Mike Moore 53
Nathaniel Lester 37
Dwan McMillan 17
David Imes 14
Shemiye McLendon 9
Stephen Nwaukoni 8
Stevie Mejia 6
Moussa Kone 3
Bryant Crowder 2
Matt Grogan 1

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Friday, February 3, 2012

In which I once again implore you to support a Dutchmen team that deserves it, and ask you to bring 10 friends to the game tomorrow

C'mon Simone get everyone to Hofstra again! You'll be home in plenty of time to watch Ferris' commercial during the Super Bowl!

Just before the first game of the 2010-11 season, I implored Flying Dutchmen fans to follow Mo Cassara’s advice and invite 10 friends to a Hofstra game because Cassara’s first Dutchmen squad was a captivating team, filled with potential, intriguing storylines and a future NBA player, that needed and deserved support from the locals.

For the first time in my life, I was right AND people listened to me (I’m usually just right). Charles Jenkins defied description, the Dutchmen were quite good (they finished tied for second in the CAA) and people showed up in droves, or at least droves by Hofstra standards. Proving once again that Long Island does a fine job of front-running, the Dutchmen performed in front of two sellout crowds and saw their average attendance rise by almost 400 fans per game.

As tends to be the case, though, once the gate attraction graduated and the program endured a year after slump, the fans decided to stay at home and watch, umm, whatever is on TV Saturdays at 4 pm and midweek nights at 7 pm. Jenkins is playing for the Golden State Warriors, the Dutchmen are 8-16 and 2-10 in the CAA and the average attendance in 13 games at Hofstra Arena is 2,320—a decline of more than 700 fans from a year ago.

Beginning tomorrow, the Dutchmen will be home three of the next four Saturdays, which should provide a bit of a boost to the year-end numbers, but let’s face it, I’ve seen this movie before and I know how it ends: With acres of empty seats watching a sub-.500 team.

Which is a shame, because while the Dutchmen are stumbling this year, they are, in a way, even more compelling and deserving of support than a year ago. As you no doubt know—and once again, I have slipped into preaching-to-the-choir mode, because if you are reading this, you not only know how the Dutchmen are doing this year but the gut-wrenching fashion in which they got to this point, just bear with me, I am rambling here—the Dutchmen have patented the near-miss with seven losses by six points or less, including four in which the winning points were scored in the final 20 seconds, and 12 losses by 10 points or less. Despite losing twice as much as they’ve won, the Dutchmen’s net point differential is a mere negative-11.

The Dutchmen were 0-7 against the top five teams in the CAA last month but led Old Dominion by 13 points in the first half in Norfolk, played VCU to a dead heat in Richmond for a little more than a half, raced out to 9-0 leads at home against both Northeastern and George Mason, jumped out to a 6-0 lead against Drexel at home and had a chance to tie the score or take the lead in the final 20 seconds at home against Northeastern, Drexel and George Mason.

Of course, as the record indicates, this is an imperfect bunch—not imperfect in the way the rest of us are imperfect basketball players, but imperfect in that, for whatever reason, they have tiny flaws that have been magnified in a league in which the difference between winning and losing is microscopic.

Mike Moore is prone to getting frustrated and forcing ill-advised shots when he’s either draped or not getting shots. Nathaniel Lester can be either a bit too aggressive (as when he tried forcing a foul along the baseline and instead turned the ball over in the waning seconds of the first game against Northeastern and kicked a ball away on a fast break in Boston last weekend) or not aggressive enough, as when he waits a split-second too long to go back up with the bal under the basket.

Dwan McMillan, who is shooting 35 percent from the field and 63 percent from the foul line while fashioning a 1.4 assist-to-turnover ratio in CAA play, is probably a bit stretched as the starting point guard. Stevie Mejia was supposed to be the starter, but a lingering hamstring injury has hampered him physically and mentally.

David Imes has shot 50 percent or better in 12 games—and 33 percent or less in 10 games. Sixth man Shemiye McLendon is now the eighth man, thanks largely to a suddenly flat shot and a protracted slump in which he’s made just four of 24 3-pointers in his last nine games. Big men Stephen Nwaukoni and Moussa Kone are very raw. Bryant Crowder is Jackson State’s problem now.

Many teams in the Dutchmen’s seemingly hopeless position—we’ll get into the gargantuan task of saving the season at the CAA Tournament in a bit—would have packed it in for the season or lacked the resiliency to keep bouncing back. One and/or the other pretty much happened in Jay Wright’s second season, when the Dutchmen opened the season by splitting their first 14 games before falling to Northeastern on a buzzer-beating 3-pointer. That began a nine-game losing streak for the Dutchmen, who ended up losing 11 of their final 13 games by an average of almost 17 points per game, Each of their final 10 losses was a double-digit affair.

But this is not an 8-16 team, in terms of either makeup or talent, and while frustration has seeped into their play at times, the Dutchmen have never quit. Now, of course, it’s easy to say an honest effort should be expected regardless of circumstance. But it says a lot about the players—as well as Cassara—that the effort has remained pure.

“I called Jack [Hayes] last night on my way home,” Cassara said after the Dutchmen beat Towson, 74-49, Wednesday night. “I said ‘You know, we just had another really good practice. That’s the sign of a team that hasn’t given up. That’s a sign of a team that’s continuing to work hard.”

It also says a lot about Cassara that he takes Dutchmen losses so badly that you are tempted to beat him to his Point Lookout home and empty the silverware drawer of forks and knives. Cassara didn’t get much sleep when the Dutchmen were the feel-good story of the regular season last year (thank you very much VCU for stealing our thunder once the NCAA Tournament got underway), so you can imagine his state of mind in the late nights and early mornings this year.

This team and these players will not define the Cassara Era at Hofstra. The guys who will do that are either still in high school or sitting at the end of the bench in warmups for every home game this season: Transfers Jamal Coombs-McDaniel and Taran Buie, redshirt freshman Jordan Allen and, perhaps, Fresno State transfer Daquan Brown, who is enrolled at Hofstra this semester and hopes to get a hardship waiver and be ruled eligible by the NCAA for next season. (Daquan, if you’re reading this, Google “Brad Kelleher” and get comfortable in those sweats)

Some coaches in Cassara’s position would view a team like this as a write-off, speak early and often of how good next year will be and fret only about how this year will impact his win-loss record when he pursues his next gig. But Cassara coaches every game, and takes every loss, as if his career is riding on it. The enduring image of this season is Cassara running alongside a basketball skittering near the Hofstra bench during the James Madison game, as if he was going to dive after it himself.

As I asked a little less than 15 months ago: How can you not support a team like this? Coming out to the Arena for the first of the final four home games tomorrow is a chance for you to get in on the ground floor and say you were there at the beginning of the revival, even if it will almost certainly take until at least next year for us to all rise in unison after Cassara leads Hofstra to the promised land (since 2001-02, only one team that has started CAA play as poorly as the Dutchmen has won even one CAA Tournament game).

More importantly, it is a chance to support the seniors whose focus and commitment hasn’t wavered even as their last lap around the track has been anything but storybook. McMillan, who will end up spending less than a season-and-a-half in a Hofstra uniform thanks to the eye injury he suffered after 11 games last season—just beyond the point at which he would have still been eligible for a redshirt—has turned into the Dutchmen’s vocal leader and one hell of an entertaining player to watch. Don’t believe me? Watch what he does with the basketball and the referee the next time he’s at the free throw line.

Going all the way back to his high school days in Connecticut, Moore has never been thrust into the position of trying to create for others. He’ll lapse into old habits, but he’s trying: Moore has matched or exceeded his previous single-game high for assists (five) three times this season, all in the last 12 games. Lester had 22 double-digit scoring efforts in his first three seasons but 20 already this year and scored the 1,000th point of his career Wednesday—not bad for someone who wasn’t even on pace for 900 points at the start of the season.

Nobody’s dug deeper—in both the symbolic and literal senses—than Moore and Lester, each of whom are fifth-year seniors who embody the student-athlete ideal. Moore graduated in four years despite transferring to Hofstra after his sophomore year—it took me five-and-a-half years to do that, and I certainly wasn’t spending several hours a day in the gym and a chunk of the year on the road—and is getting his master’s in education. Lester, who came back for a redshirt senior year after missing last season with a quad injury, graduated in three-and-a-half years and is pursuing a master’s in linguistics.

Half a decade removed from high school, college life has to be growing a bit tedious for Moore, who turns 23 in May, and Lester, who turns 77—err, 24—in April. After putting in so much time with the program, they deserve a better reward than this, yet they show up for work everyday and hold out hope their final few weeks of college basketball will be memorable ones.

“It’s a credit to these two guys,” Cassara said as he was flanked by Lester and Moore following the loss to George Mason. “They continue to have positive attitudes. I’m really proud of them. I know that they’re incredibly frustrated. This is their senior year and they want nothing more than to win.”

The resolve is trickling down to the underclassmen as well: Less than half an hour after the Dutchmen won Wednesday night, Imes—who was just 1-of-8 from the field in the victory—was on the Arena floor taking dozens of jump shots.

The Dutchmen haven’t quit. Neither should you. Be there tomorrow with 10 friends.

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Hofstra 74, Towson 49 (Or: Why do they feel this way? The promise of a new day)

You see, kids, long before Paula Abdul was that loon on American Idol, she had six no. 1 hits, the last of which was "The Promise Of A New Day." I would post the video, but she was wearing almost nothing at all and so it would be inappropriate. Well, that and it would result in the incineration of the Man Card I don't even own anyway.

With the arrival of a new month and a fresh start came an unfamiliar role for the Flying Dutchmen basketball team: Favorite.

Yet while the oddsmakers declared the Dutchmen were 15.5 points better than Towson Wednesday, Mo Cassara felt anything but secure. Towson, after all, was the one with the momentum Wednesday after it broke the longest losing streak in Division I history by beating UNC Wilmington last Saturday—a win that, technically, put Towson ahead of fellow one-win squad Hofstra in the CAA standings.

“Today was, in all honesty, the tightest I’ve been going into a game in a while because it was probably the first time in a month we were actually favored,” Cassara said. “So it was a little bit of pressure today saying this is a game we’ve got to win or we should win. We haven’t had that in a while. So I was curious to see how our guys reacted.”

Turns out the Dutchmen enjoyed being the favorites. Not only did the Dutchmen lead from wire-to-wire in a 74-49 win, but Mike Moore (28 points) and Nathaniel Lester (19 points, including the 1,000th of his career on a free throw with 15:19 to play) outscored Towson outscored the Tigers by themselves until reserve Christian Collins hit a 3-pointer just before the final buzzer.

“We made it a challenge to ourselves in the locker room to just outplay them, outwork them, because we were on, basically, the same boat,” Moore said.

It wasn’t a perfect game by the Dutchmen, who shot 40 percent and received as many field goals from walk-on Matt Grogan in four attempts over six minutes as starters David Imes, Stephen Nwaukoni and Dwan McMillan had in 16 attempts over 74 minutes. (The good news: That was enough to—SPOILER ALERT—earn Grogan his first appearance in the Stars of the Game)

The Dutchmen were whistled for a Mason-esque three technical fouls by another fine #CAAHoops officiating crew (only Lester’s, for hanging on the rim after a dunk, appeared to be deserved) that lost control of a game that grew sloppy and chippy.

But the effort was more than enough against a Towson team that reverted back to the bad habits that put it in the record book for all the wrong reasons. The Tigers committed 27 turnovers, had one more defensive rebound (21) than the Dutchmen had offensive rebounds and shot 14-of-33 from the free throw line.

The Dutchmen recorded 12 steals, including five by Moore, enjoyed a double-digit lead throughout the final 26 minutes. They went on a 13-0 run after Towson closed within 10 points with 16:33 to play and extended the lead to as many as 28 on Grogan’s putback in the final minute.

“I thought our effort was great tonight,” Cassara said. “Our execution can improve but our effort was great. I’m proud of that.”

Afterward, Cassara, Moore and Lester were sporting some rare smiles about not only the win—the Dutchmen’s first home victory in CAA play in a mere 340 days dating back to Charles Jenkins’ finale last Feb. 26—and Lester’s achievement but also their ability to leave January behind and focus on February. During a team meeting Monday, at the end of the Dutchmen’s worst month in a decade, coaches and players alike implored each other to approach the remaining games as an entirely new season.

“We can’t continue to talk about games that we might have lost at the last second or shots we didn’t make or plays we didn’t execute,” Cassara said. “We have a new clean slate. We have, essentially, a nine-game season and we just keep marking off every day. We’re going to try to win every day, whether it’s a practice or a game and try to continue to get better everyday. And I think we made a little bit of progress towards that today.”

The Dutchmen also made a bit of progress in the CAA standings—into a tie for 10th with William & Mary, whom the Dutchmen play for the only time on Feb. 22—with the win, which also went a long way towards assuring they will not finish in last place. By beating Towson in the lone meeting of the season between the teams (hooray unbalanced schedule that destroys tradition!), the Dutchmen are assured of having the tiebreaker over the Tigers, who would have to win two more games than the Dutchmen the rest of the way in order to finish ahead of Hofstra.

“I’m happy for everybody—nobody likes to lose—and I also know as a coach how close we’ve been,” Cassara said. “I think our guys continue to remain competitive and I’m excited to go back to practice [Thursday]. I really am. I’m excited to get to practice [Thursday] and I’m excited for our game on Saturday.”

3 STARS OF THE GAME (vs. Towson, 2/1)
3: Mike Moore
2: Nathaniel Lester
1: Matt Grogan

SEASON STANDINGS
Mike Moore 51
Nathaniel Lester 34
Dwan McMillan 17
David Imes 14
Shemiye McLendon 9
Stephen Nwaukoni 8
Stevie Mejia 6
Moussa Kone 2
Bryant Crowder 2
Matt Grogan 1

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Towson looks back as well as forward as it embarks upon a historic rebuilding job

Towson State celebrates after winning the second of the Tigers' three straight ECC titles and earning the league's final automatic bid to the NCAA Tournament in 1991. Photo courtesy of Towson athletics. (PS: Told you the ECC existed, Litos!)

Long before Hofstra was chasing a pair of conference foes with Final Four resumes, long before Hofstra should have had the chance to do what George Mason did and long before Hofstra pursued and finally toppled Delaware as the premier program in the America East, Hofstra wanted to be Towson State.

The suburban Baltimore school was the roadblock the Flying Dutchmen basketball team could not get past in the waning days of the East Coast Conference. From 1986-87 through 1991-92—in what amounted to the ECC’s final six seasons—Towson State reached the league title game five times, finished first or second in the regular season four times, earned the ECC’s final two automatic bids to the NCAA Tournament in 1990 and 1991 and won the final three conference tournaments.

Towson State dominated Hofstra over that span, during which the Tigers won 12 of 13 meetings—including 10 in a row at one point—and continually stymied the best teams Butch van Breda Kolff put together in his second stint on the Hofstra sidelines.

Towson State swept the season series from the Dutchmen in 1989-90, when the Tigers won at the buzzer in Maryland and knocked off Hofstra on the final weekend of the season, to win a three-way tiebreaker with Hofstra and Lehigh for the top seed at 8-6. Hofstra finally snapped its winless streak against the Tigers in 1991-92, when the Dutchmen won the ECC regular season crown, but Towson came back from a 9-0 deficit (hmm sounds familiar) to win the conference title game and end the Dutchmen’s NIT hopes.

Lately, of course, it has been Towson (the State was dropped as part of a rebranding effort in 1996) on the receiving end of dominance—from Hofstra and everyone else. Entering tonight’s game at Hofstra, the Flying Dutchmen have won 27 of the last 32 meetings between the two schools, including the last six dating back to 2008 as well as a streak of 11 in a row from 1996 through 2001.

Towson has spent the last 14 months bottoming out following 15 years of mismanagement. The Tigers became the first CAA school to go winless in league play last year, when they lost their final 19 games of the season, and opened this year by losing their first 22 to shatter the previous record for longest losing streak in Division I history before they edged UNC Wilmington, 66-61, Saturday.

Its recent win aside, the program that was once set the standard in the ECC is now the object of sympathy among rival CAA fans, all of whom root for Towson yet none of whom want to suffer the stigma of losing to the Tigers. It is worse nationally for Towson, which is a cheap punch line for the likes of pseudo comedians such as SportsCenter anchor Neil Everett, who compared the Tigers’ losing streak to his Little League hitless streak, and elitist guardians of the game such as Seth Davis, who declared recently Towson has no business being in Division I.

And to make matters even worse, those who mock Towson often further insult the Tigers by referring to the school by an outdated or downright incorrect name.

“We’re not ‘Towson State,’” athletic director Mike Waddell said. “We’re not ‘Townson.’ We’re Towson. And that’s OK. Right at the heart of the word ‘Towson’ is the letter ‘W’ and that’s what we plan on putting a lot up in the next few years.”

In retrospect, Towson’s descent began with a decision made while the Tigers were still racking up plenty of wins. Even 20 years later, it is difficult to argue Towson shouldn’t have left the crumbling ECC for the Big South Conference, which had the automatic bid the ECC no longer possessed.

But the ECC and its natural geographic rivalries was a perfect fit for Towson, which, during the league’s heyday, could travel everywhere except Hofstra without needing an overnight stay. Towson ended up spending just three seasons in the Big South—during which it won two regular season crowns—before rejoining fellow ECC alums Delaware, Drexel and Hofstra in the North Atlantic Conference for the 1995-96 school year. But the program’s fan base and recruiting base were each badly damaged.

“Any momentum we gained during our ECC seasons disappeared,” said Towson media relations director Dan O’Connell, who has been at the school since it moved to Division I in 1979. “We went from playing schools like Bucknell, Delaware, Drexel, Lafayette, Hofstra and Rider to playing Campbell, Charleston Southern, Radford, Liberty, Coastal Carolina and UNC Asheville. We had nothing in common with these schools and our fan base never heard of them.

“Then we went to the NAC but all our momentum was gone and local players weren’t all that interested anymore.”

Another destructive long-term decision was made at the end of the 1996-97 season, when longtime coach Terry Truax—who had overseen the Tigers’ ascent in the ECC—was fired by second-year athletic director Wayne Edwards following a 9-19 campaign. It was just the second losing season in nine years for Towson—and the start of a stretch of 16 consecutive losing seasons, the fourth-longest active streak in Division I.

Towson moved to the CAA along with Delaware, Drexel and Hofstra for the 2000-01 season, but the Tigers never redoubled their investment in the program and have languished at the bottom of the CAA for 11 seasons.

“The program was neglected for a long time,” O’Connell said. “We fell behind a lot of schools during the years we were stagnant. We were not willing to spend the money to enhance the program.”

The most glaring symbol of intuitional neglect happened a year ago last week, when Towson’s game at George Mason was postponed after the Tigers got stuck in a blizzard and needed 10 hours to make the 70-mile trip to Fairfax. That Towson chose to leave at 3 p.m for a 7 p.m. game when snow was predicted didn’t please CAA commissioner Tom Yeager, who issued a statement reprimanding Towson.

Such an experience surely frustrated Waddell, who was just beginning his fourth month as the athletic director. A Type-A personality who is equal parts marketer, motivational speaker and media relations guru, Waddell exercised caution in allowing last season to play out without firing lame duck head coach Pat Kennedy yet began establishing how he expected excellence from Towson employees.

“Doing the little things, paying attention to the details, not letting the little things slide,” Waddell said. “Because little things grow into middle-sized things grow into large things grow into gargantuan things. You’ve got to be an absolute stickler—almost fanatical—about the little things that make champions.

“It goes back to two words: Expect success. That’s what we’re about. Four syllables, two words, one Towson. Expect success.”

In Pat Skerry, Waddell found a head coach who shares his around-the-clock approach and as well as his program-building philosophies, even when a spate of defections left Towson with a decimated roster that had little to no hope of competing in the CAA in his first season. The three best underclassmen from last year’s record-setting team all left school while RaShawn Polk sat out this year following an off-season arrest, which left the Tigers with a single returning player—Erique Gumbs—who averaged a grand total of 3.6 points per game last year.

“I would say that, along with what Baylor and Indiana and Cincinnati had to do to rebuild their basketball programs, we’re right there with them—this has been a long time, it’s been systematic and it’s been comprehensive,” Waddell said. “So Pat has a tough job. But Pat also has the ability to come in and do things the right way.”

For Skerry—who said he has no hobbies and has always believed “coaching beats working for a living…I love it”—part of that involved absorbing the punishment of a grueling non-conference schedule, including season-opening games at Kansas and Michigan, as well as an unforgiving CAA slate which includes two games apiece against the league’s top five teams, all while refusing to allow the Tigers to make excuses and instilling in them the expectations he’ll have moving forward.

“I believe in shooting straight with my guys,” Skerry said. “I also felt that guys are going to be here for two, three or four years. We’ve got to help change habits and develop different habits. Once you do that, you have a culture, you have a program. To just kind of get through the year even though we have some shortcomings and play make believe and all of that, that would put us one year behind.”

Recruiting-wise, Skerry is approaching Towson like Jay Wright approached Hofstra a generation ago, when he revived what he called “a sleeping giant” by tapping into a basketball-rich market and finding that one player—Speedy Claxton—who could turn around the entire program.

“Three hours to the north in New York, three hours to the south in Richmond—we’re in fertile recruiting ground and we plan to capitalize on that daily and yearly,” Skerry said.

Towson’s version of Claxton could be in next year’s recruiting class, which, a la Hofstra, features a pair of big-time transfers (Georgetown’s Jerrelle Benimon and South Florida’s Mike Burwell) as well as a handful of promising high schoolers. “I won’t tell you which one, but I think one of our recruits could be that type of an iconic player—and so do a lot of other coaches around this league who were rather speechless when they heard who we had signed,” Waddell said.

While Waddell is unfailingly upbeat, optimistic and entertaining in discussing Towson’s future—he said Monday the best part about ending the losing streak is that “we don’t have to go to Coke Zero or Spaghetti O’s” as Towson looks to sell naming rights to its new arena, which is scheduled to open for the 2013-14 season—he is also an uncompromising realist who won’t allow any of the Towson staff to rest on recent accomplishments.

At the athletic department’s weekly meeting Monday, he didn’t even bring up the win over UNC Wilmington. And the players and coaches who helped the Towson football team reach the Division I-AA playoffs for the first time ever this year—a mere one season after the Tigers went 1-10—have been ordered not to wear any clothing commemorating the 2011 season inside the football facilities.

“We’re building a family here and we’re trying to raise a teenager,” Waddell said. “We’re at zygote right now. We’re not mature. We’re not even into the gestation phase. We’re just trying to grow and do it the smart way.”

He is also reconnecting with Towson’s successful past—Truax, who is in regular contact with Skerry, and the 1990-91 Tigers squad were all recently inducted into the school’s Hall of Fame—and keeping one eye on a better future by embracing the largely negative attention that comes Towson’s way now (though Towson was the lead story on the 6 p.m. SportsCenter Saturday).

Waddell, a former broadcaster in the ACC with North Carolina and Virginia, is accessible, active and patient with all forms of media. When Davis—who was in college a few hours to the south at Duke when Towson reached the NCAA Tournament—bashed Towson, Waddell invited him, via Twitter, to a game.

Waddell also realizes engaging with the press is the best way to keep Towson on people’s minds and shape the story as the Tigers rebuild. And make no mistake: Waddell expects a return to the days in which everyone else wants to be Towson and the Tigers were anything but a sympathetic figure.

“It’s like coach tells you: We got beat by 30 points or 40 points, you got exactly what you deserved,” Waddell said. “You don’t want to be the butt of people’s jokes? Then don’t play like that.

“But you know what? In a few years, when we’re beating people like that. I don’t want to hear anybody complain we’re rubbing it in. That’s how it goes. There is no mercy in fighting or sports. I asked no quarter and I’ll give none. That’s just how it goes. I don’t have a problem with that.”

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.