Thursday, January 6, 2011

Hofstra 87, George Mason 74 (Or: Ain’t it wonderful to be alive when the rock and roll plays)

As if last night could have gotten any better: DD anthem "Keeping The Faith" was on as we pulled into the driveway. Swear to Jenkins. No writer's liberty there.

Anyone who knows anything at all about the history of Hofstra-George Mason knows it’s dangerous for the Flying Dutchmen to leave superstars on the court in the waning seconds of a lopsided win. You never know what might happen.

But the last time the Dutchmen beat Mason at Hofstra—11 days before Tony Skinn became a synonym for thuggish poor sportsmanship and 19 days before the Great Screw Job—Charles Jenkins was a high school senior. The last time the Dutchmen beat the Patriots anywhere, back in February 2007 in Fairfax, he was a redshirt freshman. And the last time Mason visited Hofstra, Jenkins spent the final minutes of a blowout loss fighting back tears on the bench.

Jenkins has been waiting his entire career for last night. So the risks of playing Mason in the last seconds be damned, he was going to savor every last second of last night’s gloriously awesome 87-74 victory over the Patriots.

Greg Washington rebounded an Isaiah Tate miss with 27 seconds left and fired the ball down court to Jenkins, who finished off a nearly perfect second half by dribbling out the clock—imagine that, the shot clock off in a double-digit win and he didn’t shoot, no wonder Mason didn’t recruit him—with a grin slowly spreading across his face. He bounced the ball higher and higher as the final seconds ticked off, and once the buzzer sounded and Hofstra was officially alone atop the CAA as the league’s last unbeaten team at 3-0 (goddamn, that really is true, isn’t it?), screamed and waved his arms in the direction of the Lions Den.

“Thirty seconds left in the game, coach turned to me [and] said ‘Want to take [you] out?’” said Jenkins, who produced a brilliant line of 32 points (on 9-of-13 shooting from the field and 12-of-14 from the free throw line), eight assists, five rebounds and three steals. “And I said ‘No. I want every minute of this.’ It meant a lot.”

It meant a lot to everyone. Anyone who bleeds blue and gold—whether they were at Hofstra in 2006 or not, whether they rant and scream and rave on a blog or not—was starving for a night like Wednesday, for a chance to begin evening the score. As Tom Pecora said: Mason, their reputation precedes them.

The emails and Tweets came tumbling in yesterday afternoon, all with an underlying sense of confidence we haven’t felt in recent years that this time would be different. Indeed, it was so different—so very, very different and so very long in coming.

And not just the part in which Hofstra beat Mason for the first time in 1,425 days (but who’s counting?), or the part in which the insufferably smug Jim Larranaga was reduced to stomping his feet on the sideline and moaning about Mo Cassara being out of the coach’s box in the final minutes before he finally pulled a Bill Belichick with silent dead-fish handshakes in the post-game greeting line (but hey, again, at least nobody got punched, so that’s progress).

It was also the dominant and thorough fashion in which Hofstra won—completely unimaginable against a team of Mason’s caliber, but particularly incomprehensible given the Dutchmen were just a week removed from trailing wire-to-wire in a 25-point loss to Iona. But the Dutchmen were by far the better team last night—and, more importantly, the tougher, more resilient and fundamentally better one, as well.

Mason opened the game on a 20-10 run that was, for all intents and purposes, a 20-6 spurt it mounted after Washington opened the game with consecutive baskets. Cassara called timeout with 11:54 left, even though the next dead ball would have been a media timeout, and changed defenses from the zone to a man-to-man.

The Dutchmen needed just seven minutes to produce their own 20-10 run, during which they got baskets from six players, none of whom were named Charles Jenkins. The Dutchmen took two one-point leads on a free throw by Stephen Nwaukoni and a layup by Shemiye McLendon, the latter of which came with 33 seconds left and gave Mason the chance for the last shot of the half.

But with four seconds left, Brad Kelleher stole the ball from Andre Cornelius near the Hofstra bench, dribbled the length of the court and drained a 30-footer at the buzzer—his third 3-pointer in as many attempts in the final 12 minutes—to give the Dutchmen a 39-35 lead and send the Arena into something approximating a frenzy.

“After our poor start, we started to pick it up on the defensive end and then we started to get momentum rolling,” Kelleher said. “I think that was just a perfect way to end a great second half of the first half.”

“We came out and played some zone and we didn’t do a great job, and a lot of credit goes to George Mason, they moved the ball and they’ve got some terrific shooters and we were just a little slow to the ball and they got some great open looks,” Cassara said. “But we hung in there. We didn’t play our best out of the gates and we kind of hung in there. I just kept telling our guys at halftime it’s all about who’s going to be tougher down the stretch. And we were ultimately the tougher team tonight.”

Just as they did Monday against Drexel the Dutchmen got into trouble in a hurry in the second half. Mason went on an 8-0 run in the first three minutes, during which the Dutchmen picked up five fouls (TOM O’CONNOR BIAS!!!!). But a Jenkins 3-point play and a pair of free throws by David Imes gave the Dutchmen a 44-43 lead and they, amazingly, would never trail again.

Those five points began a 14-0 run that turned the game into something that bordered on an out-of-body experience. The next two times Mason scored, the Dutchmen responded with a 6-0 run, the second of which was capped when Jenkins hit a layup, stole the inbounds pass and hit another layup, at which point I may or may not have actually passed out with joy.

“George Mason’s a good team and one thing coach told us is the they’re going to make a run,” Jenkins said. “One thing we had to do was stay composed and that’s what we did.”

The one time Mason actually got something going—a 9-2 run that pulled the Patriots within 67-57—the Dutchmen went on another 6-0 run. In the final five minutes, the Dutchmen took just three shots from the field—all during the same sequence, which ended with a resounding dunk by Washington—but made 15 of 18 free throws.

The Dutchmen finished 27-of-33 from the line. Mason was 11-of-20, but hey, who needs fundamentals when you are 2-of-3 on alley-oops?

Some more incredible second half stats: Mason was 13-of-33 from the field after shooting 15-of-28 in the first half. Jenkins was 7-of-8 for the Dutchmen, who finished 13-of-22 in the second half and 26-of-50 overall.

“I guess I got into a zone,” Jenkins said with an almost sheepish grin.

The Dutchmen outrebounded the Patriots 21-14 and had as many offensive rebounds (six) as Mason had defensive. In the first half, Mason enjoyed a 22-11 rebounding advantage and had 15 defensive rebounds to Hofstra’s two offensive rebounds.

“That really was the difference in the game,” Cassara said. “In the first half they were just killing us on the glass. I thought we really hung in there and battled. Some guys got some terrific rebounds, guys were fighting and boxing out. I thought our defensive intensity in the second half was much better.”

Washington’s final basket and Mike Moore’s eight free throws gave the Dutchmen five players in double figures—a remarkable number for a team that goes just nine deep and received 61 percent of its scoring from two players (Jenkins and Moore) last week against Iona.

Kelleher (13 points) and McLendon (11 points), who were 0-for-15 against Iona, were 8-of-17 last night, including 5-of-10 from 3-point land. With Dwan McMillan still out with an eye injury, Kelleher played 26 minutes despite a swollen left ankle. Washington was 5-of-6 shooting and is now 12-of-17 in his last three games.

Even those who didn’t get into double digits in the scoring column contributed. Imes, who scored a career-high 20 points on Monday, had just four last night, but pulled down a team-high eight rebounds. Yves Jules played his usual suffocating defense over 14 minutes. Nwaukoni had six rebounds in 19 minutes. And even walk-on Matt Grogan got on to the court just before the under four timeout in the second half and pulled down a rebound in the eight seconds he was out there before Cassara realized he had to get a point guard on the floor.

“Obviously thrilled with the victory, thrilled with the 3-0 start in the CAA, but I think more than anything, I’m just proud of this team,” Cassara said. “We’re down to limited bodies. We’ve got guys sick, we’ve got guys hurt, and we just found a way to win tonight. I’m really proud of our resilient effort. This group is coming together.”

Afterward, nobody wanted to go their separate ways. People were flat-out happy—lingering at the Arena and enjoying the moment. We don’t get many nights like these, us Hofstra fans.

We’re a bitter, jaded group, conditioned by experience to expect the worst. Our football team was yanked out from underneath us in cloak-and-dagger fashion that would have impressed Bob Irsay and our basketball team suffers the types of near-misses that, to be fair, are endured by every mid-major. Except, of course, for that whole 2006 thing, which was perpetuated by the school on the other end of the court last night.

We hope there will be many more moments like this in a season that is suddenly very, very interesting. We also know this almost surely won’t last forever, and that just about everybody in a wild and unpredictable CAA is going to hit a rough patch—especially a team as lean and inexperienced as Hofstra. We only have to look to last week—or to Mason last year, which opened 10-1 in conference but lost eight of its final 10 games—to know how quickly things can turn.

That 13-point win last night could be a 15-point loss—or worse—during the return visit to Fairfax Feb. 2. Or the Patriots could get the ultimate revenge and send Jenkins to the NBA with a win over Hofstra in the CAA Tournament. And if that happens, well, we will take the medicine served to us by a Mason Nation that was oddly quiet last night and once again wait ‘til next year.

Of course, Hofstra has the maturity Mason has lacked the last two seasons, and Mason didn’t have a Jenkins type last year, so who knows? All we know is last night was delicious. Every last second of it.

“Let’s go enjoy this one,” Cassara said as he got up from the podium.

Don’t worry. We did.

3 STARS OF THE GAME (vs. George Mason, 1/5)
3: Charles Jenkins
2: Brad Kelleher
1: Greg Washington

SEASON STANDINGS
Charles Jenkins 37
Mike Moore 17
David Imes 10
Greg Washington 8
Dwan McMillan 5
Brad Kelleher 3
Shemiye McClendon 2
Yves Jules 1
Stephen Nwaukoni 1

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Five pregame thoughts: George Mason

1.) Mo Cassara wasn’t thrilled with how the Flying Dutchmen responded to prosperity during the non-conference season. Well, they weren’t half as prosperous then as they are now after the big win over Drexel. The last time the Dutchmen were feeling pretty good about themselves, Florida Atlantic snapped their four-game winning streak with a 63-59 win Dec. 11. George Mason is a lot better than Florida Atlantic. How do we know that? Mason beat Florida Atlantic 66-51 Thanksgiving weekend. While dopes like me were jumping up and down yesterday over the Drexel win, my guess is Cassara was all business and reminding the Dutchmen that any good vibes generated Monday will disappear with a poor outing tonight.

2.) George Mason is good—really good. There. I got my one compliment out of the way. That cursed, wretched Final Four run in 2006 opened up a whole new stream of players to Sensei John Kreese, err, coach Jim Larranaga, and he’s taken advantage of it by recruiting some top-flight Cobra Kais, err, Patriots. Mason is the most talented team in the league and the Dutchmen absolutely have to avoid the first half fades that were so frequent in November and December. Mason is almost unstoppable when it’s feeling good, playing from ahead (so to speak) and bursting with momentum, as Mason proved in shooting better than 50 percent in wins over Radford, Florida Atlantic, UNC Wilmington, Loyola, Liberty and Delaware. The Dutchmen must produce the same defensive effort they produced Monday, because if the Patriots get rolling, it could be a long night and I could have plenty of time to come up with mean things to say about how they’re running up the score.

3.) The Dutchmen will likely again have to figure out a way to win without filling it up from outside. Like Drexel (which is limiting opponents to 24.8 percent shooting from 3-point land), Mason is dominant on defense beyond the arc 28.6 percent. That means plenty of midrange jumpers from David Imes (8-for-8 against Drexel) and Greg Washington (3-for-4 against Drexel) and the usual slashing and driving from Charles Jenkins and Mike Moore.

4.) Play a complete game. Mason’s talent makes it the closest thing the CAA has to a BCS team—a squad that can win by turning it on in the final 10 minutes. That’s what happened in Fairfax last January, when the Dutchmen squandered a late seven-point lead and fell by four. Not only do the Dutchmen have to avoid a first half fade, they have to avoid a second half one as well. Forty minutes.

5.) Keep it close and hope Mason’s immaturity crops up late. Yes, yes, we know, everyone’s a year older and more mature, and the 1980s sitcom-esque trip to Italy this summer (seriously, didn’t I see that on an episode of The Facts of Life?) bonded the Patriots. But the fact is Mason set an unofficial record for suspensions on a single team last season and Luke Hancock and Ryan Pearson have picked up technicals this season. Keep it close, respond to every Mason flurry and hope the Patriots get flustered, which will likely manifest itself at the free throw line, where Mason is shooting just 64.7 percent.

5b.) Make me a happy Dutchman by winning, damnit. Five straight losses to these guys sucks. And if not for me, do it for Hall of Fame Flying Dutchman Bert Blyleven!!!

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Oh hi Mason Nation! How have you been?

Middle-aged blogging...don't do it!

A year ago at this very moment (well, not THIS very moment, but the moment at which I was typing this last night), I was about ready to forgive and forget this whole George Mason thing. OK, I wasn’t ready to forgive and I’ll never forget 2006, but I was thinking it was about time to let bygones be bygones and just watch Mason games without receiving ample doses of intravenous blood pressure medication.

I came to this realization after an enjoyable day of driving and night of watching basketball in Fairfax. I drove there on the spur of the moment to watch the Flying Dutchmen take on George Mason and met beforehand a fellow jettisoned sportswriter and a couple of his jettisoned sportswriter friends, all of whom are Mason alumni, at Brion’s, a bar across the street from the Mason campus. Imagine Bogarts—err, Bar Social—if anyone on Long Island cared about Hofstra hoops and you’d get an idea of the décor inside. Other than being hit in the gro—err, face—with reminders of Mason’s Final Four run in 2006, it was a cool place to grab a bite to eat.

Then we went into the Patriot Center, which was also a cool place to watch a basketball game with all the caveats about Brion’s, and watched the Flying Dutchmen, in a familiar 2009-10 storyline, almost but not quite beat Mason. Other than the loss and their fans channeling Paul O’Neill every time a call went against the Patriots and the occasional leather lung jackass who found it funny to shout “TONY SKINN!!!” as the Dutchmen shot a free throw, I had a good time.

I walked back to Brion’s with my friend and his friends, bought a round of drinks for the gang—because I’m just that nice a guy—and got back into my car for the ride home.

These guys aren’t too bad, I thought as I drove along 495 south of Baltimore. Hofstra and George Mason are remarkably similar as schools—long-time commuter colleges founded deep into the 20th century that are trying to break free of the tag by ramping up their academic profile in hopes of keeping pace with schools a century or more older.

Athletically speaking, before the last 15 years or so, our basketball histories were eminently forgettable. We both traveled a great distance just to get to 2006. And now neither one of us played football. In a weird way, we were almost brothers—bitterly hateful brothers, but hey, isn’t that what sibling rivalry is all about?

Oh sure, I still didn’t like Jim Larranaga or Tom O’Connor very much, nor did I care for anyone who wore the uniform in 2006, but hell, you can’t hate forever. Life is too short…

And then I saw the streak of white light coming at me from the left. I had enough time to think “Oh shit,” but not enough time to actually utter the words before I was hit and shoved into the lane to the right, where I pinballed off another car and was sent careening across four lanes of pretty heavy traffic.

With every spin, I anticipated the final, fatal hit, one that would assure my next blog posting would be from The Other Side, wherever that is. But it miraculously never arrived, and several screamingly terrifying seconds later, I found myself going backwards in drive in the breakdown lane. Night Ranger’s “Goodbye” was playing on the rental car’s CD player. That’s ironic, I thought. I patted myself down, not entirely sure I was still alive and half-expecting to find a vital organ hanging out.

A few minutes later, the woman who hit me and I struck up a conversation, because talking to the person who nearly wiped you off the planet is apparently what you do when you dodge dismemberment. She asked where I was from and where I’d been before the crash. I told her a college basketball game in Fairfax.

“Oh, George Mason?” she said.

“Yeah.”

“I went there.”

No kidding. Now they’re actually trying to kill me.


You did this to me, Mason Nation!!!

But getting the scare of a lifetime courtesy of a drunken Mason alum—oh yes, I haven’t even gotten into that, or how she failed her sobriety test miserably, or how we ran into each other at the junkyard 12 hours later, when we were both claiming items from our wrecked cars—didn’t cement my Mason contempt. That was random, fluky, wild stuff—a good story, especially since all my bones remained intact, but just Tarantino-level weirdness. Honestly, I half-expected the freaky guy at the junkyard to lock the door behind us and bring out the gimp.

It took another 15 days for the seeds of hate to be sowed at the Arena. I drove into Hempstead that night already in a bad mood. The Dutchmen were spiraling downward, Mason was red-hot—I knew it was going to be a lousy night long before the opening tap. And it sucked almost as bad as, umm, getting into a car accident south of Baltimore: Mason won, 90-72, and you can see what pissed me off here.

Thanks to the Twitters and the #CAA feed on the CAAZone, I was already loathed in Mason Nation before I posted that, and once it went up, the response was swift and predictable. It had been a long time since I’d been called such names. I'd never been so scorned for my employability, or lack thereof. And I didn’t realize last January that having someone start a fake Twitter on your “behalf” was so oddly honorific.

Fifty weeks and one day later, I stand by every word of what I wrote and still feel the way I feel about Mason and certain higher-ups. My favorite team is still Hofstra, and my second-favorite team still whomever is playing Mason. No apologies for that.

But the funny thing is the fallout, in a weird way, further established the commonality I’d begun to feel in Fairfax. Not with everybody, of course: The Mason fans for whom Freshman English was an elective (my second-favorite letter from last January: the one that ended with the signature “Employeed Mason Grad.”) stopped fake Tweeting, largely disappeared and went back to participating in their usual activities such as peeing in the sandbox and getting banned at the CAAZone.

In one very special case, however, one of these folks started his own blog, which is the CAAhoops version of Martha Dumptruck walking into traffic in hopes of emulating the cool kids. That’s cute. It’s "crutial" that “adults” find a hobby and come to realize that not everyone should have a blog.

After the initial wave of profanity-filled invective—on both sides—subsided, though, I realized bantering with the intelligent wing of Mason Nation is a lot of fun. I realized it’s not their fault they root for a bunch of bullying meanies, and they realized it’s not my fault I root for a team whose coach and athletic director don’t have Satan on speed dial. These folks also realized sentences such as the one you just read are meant in jest. Mostly. Partially.

We also realized we’re generally in the same position here, even after Mason’s stupid no-good rotten fraudulent Final Four run in 2006. We still share a passion for mid-major hoops, which automatically makes us better than those who don’t. We still root for schools and a conference in which the season comes down to the first weekend of March. We still root for schools who, despite the recruiting boost they enjoyed in the aftermath of 2006, are still usually outclassed in games against BCS programs.

We like baseball, and football, and movies about war, and we can easily get along for 363 or so days per year. And today? Today they will let me have it, and I will let them have it, and I will pray to some kind of deity that 12 hours from now, I’m the one still letting them have it and not the one who lost the Twitter hashtag bet.

And I have come to understand that while I would love for the Dutchmen to win tonight and end their five-game losing streak against the Patriots (beat Mason), the season will not be made or broken by what happens tonight (Beat Mason) and we can’t get too carried away one way or the other (FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BEAT MASON) because it would suck to win in January and lose in March (I’LL WORRY ABOUT THAT LATER JUST FREAKING BEAT MASON TONIGHT).

That’s what I tell myself, anyway. And if the Dutchmen lose, I will take solace in the fact the drive home is a lot shorter tonight than a year ago this week and that I won’t get hit by a drunken Mason grad. Probably. Hopefully.

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Hofstra 75, Drexel 69 (Or: Some things stay the same and some are due for change)

I was happy to learn it's tougher to find Hall & Oates songs about wins than it is about losses.

As is often the case, the “lede” to the Iona recap last week was not the one I had in mind originally. In fact, I’d written most of a blog about how the Iona game could define the Dutchmen’s season, and how most coaches hate to read and hear such declarations from writers so early in a season, until I realized the actual story was Charles Jenkins declaring he would never again display a lack of aggression in the first half.

Anyway, good thing I shelved that entry, because now I can say that LAST night is the type of game that could not only define a season but an era, and how Mo Cassara would probably cringe upon reading and hearing this tripe spill from my fingers and my mouth.

But the Flying Dutchmen’s 75-69 upset win over Drexel is huge, and not just because it improved the Dutchmen to 3-0 in the ECC (you didn’t think I’d forget that silly little meme did you?), put them into a three-way tie for first place in the CAA and assured they would receive a bye in the CAA Tournament, if only the CAA regular season lasted two games and the tournament began, say, Wednesday.

The win, of course, doesn’t guarantee much, especially with the most talented team in the league, George Mason, coming to town tomorrow night (that’s me playing nice, Mason Nation, don’t get used to it!) and a roadie at always-tough Northeastern awaiting the Dutchmen Saturday. All last night does is assure the Dutchmen will leave the weekend no worse than .500 in the CAA, which, let’s face it, we all would have taken a month or a week or a day ago.

But this win is a pivotal one because of what it signified in the short- and long-term. Beating the hottest and most surprising team in the league—on the road—to resume CAA play is the Signature Win this team has lacked since the departure of Loren Stokes and Carlos Rivera and the Signature Win that eluded the Dutchmen in such demoralizing fashion last Jan. 2, when William & Mary—which, like Drexel, was predicted to finish at or near the bottom of the league before it threatened to climb into the Top 25 during the non-conference season—took its only lead of the game on its last basket to edge the Dutchmen 48-47 at the Arena.

There were many reasons why that loss began a 1-7 stretch for the Dutchmen that nearly derailed their season, but a win there would have likely done a lot more than merely made the Dutchmen 3-6 at the halfway point of the CAA schedule. The Dutchmen were, to invoke a cliché that I will use because it allows me to post another Hall and Oates video, so close yet so far away to that Signature Win, having squandered second half leads against UConn, Charlotte and St. John’s, that it began wearing on them and contributed to a brutal January.

This victory, and particularly the way it was recorded, allows the Dutchmen to clear a hurdle that had been in their path for the last four seasons. The best-case scenario for a victory didn’t come close to actually happening, but the Dutchmen won anyway.

The Dutchmen, one of the nation’s best 3-point shooting teams, were just 2-of-11 from beyond the arc, by far their worst performance of the season, yet were 24-of-43 from everywhere else. They were outrebounded 44-31 and allowed 18 offensive rebounds, but that was a result of the Dutchmen throwing a variety of defenses at Drexel and forcing the Dragons to shoot a season-worst 37.3 percent from the field.

Everyone shy of Demetrius Dudley was in serious foul trouble for the Dutchmen in the second half, when they got into the bonus within the first five minutes and saw Charles Jenkins and Greg Washington both head to the bench with four fouls within the first six minutes. Jenkins and Washington hit the pine with the Dutchmen down 44-40 and Drexel in the midst of a 15-4 run, yet the Dutchmen and their piecemeal lineup (at one point in the second half, the five players on the court for Hofstra were Mike Moore, Shemiye McLendon, Brad Kelleher, Yves Jules and David Imes—three newcomers and two sophomores who barely saw the court as freshmen) hung on thanks to Imes, who outscored Drexel 6-4 with Jenkins on the bench.

Imes had the best game of his career, shooting a perfect 8-for-8 from the floor and scoring 14 of his 20 points in the second half. Imes, who grabbed eight rebounds as well, also hit the most pivotal basket of the final seven minutes, a reverse layup immediately shortly after Washington fouled out and Drexel took its biggest lead (55-50) with 7:10 left.

By that point, Jenkins was back. Utilized to perfection by Cassara, who pulled Jenkins in defensive situations and just before media timeouts whenever possible, Jenkins—who displayed his newfound aggression in leading the Dutchmen to a seven-point halftime lead—scored 11 of his game-high 23 points in the final eight minutes.

Mike Moore, who had another game in which he managed to make multiple contributions despite a quiet night offensively (11 points, a team-high nine rebounds and a game-high three steals) scored eight of his 11 points after Jenkins picked up his fourth foul. Jenkins and Moore had the most pivotal baskets of the game, back-to-back coast-to-coast layups that extended the Dutchmen’s lead to six with a minute left.

The Dutchmen got valuable contributions from the rest of their lean roster. Brad Kelleher, five nights removed from an ugly 0-for-8 performance from the field, ran the point again with Dwan McMillan still out sick and had seven points, five assists and one turnover in 33 minutes. Shemiye McLendon, who was 0-for-7 against Iona, was 0-for-3 from the field but hit the two free throws that gave the Dutchmen the lead for good at 63-62.

Yves Jules, who missed two of the last four games due to injury and illness, played a season-high 21 minutes and blanketed hot-shooting Chris Fouch, who was just 3-of-10 from the field and 1-of-5 from 3-point land. The five attempts from beyond the arc were a season low for Fouch. Even Paul Bilbo, forced into action due to the early foul trouble for Washington and Stephan Nwaukoni, scored his first career basket on a gorgeous sky hook to end the first half.

Again: One win doesn’t ensure anything for this season, but this victory is more proof the Dutchmen have a keeper in Cassara. We all wondered how easily Cassara could shift from buddy mode in the spring to hard-ass mode in the fall and winter. Pretty easily and pretty convincingly, as it turns out, because he put the Dutchmen through what he called “boot camp” over New Year’s weekend after the Iona debacle and promised no Hofstra team would ever play like that under him ever again.

And the Dutchmen responded by producing a long-awaited Signature Win. Imagine what we’ll be saying about Cassara and the possibilities of this season if they do it again tomorrow night.

3 STARS OF THE GAME (vs. Drexel, 1/3)
3: David Imes
2: Charles Jenkins
1: Mike Moore

SEASON STANDINGS
Charles Jenkins 34
Mike Moore 17
David Imes 10
Greg Washington 7
Dwan McMillan 5
Shemiye McClendon 2
Brad Kelleher 1
Yves Jules 1
Stephen Nwaukoni 1

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch athttp://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Five halftime thoughts: Drexel

1.) Forgot to mention in my pregame thoughts the similarities between the opening games of the CAA schedule this year and last. The Dutchmen opened last year by hosting a surprise borderline Top 25 team in William & Mary before visiting George Mason. This year: Visit surprise borderline Top 25 team in Drexel, host George Mason. Last year’s team squandered a golden chance for a signature win by frittering away the lead in the last minute of the 48-47 loss to William & Mary and the inability to finish that off seemed to drag them down the rest of the month. So today’s real first thought is…

2.) Finish it and get that signature win. The Dutchmen have played very, very well in taking a 34-27 lead and avoiding the type of first half meltdown that has dogged them most of the year. This is the type of win that can set a tone for the season and inspire and lift a team to play beyond its talent level the rest of the way. To lead by seven at the half and lose would be heartbreaking. Finish it.

3.) Charles Jenkins has been as aggressive as advertised. According to my unofficial stats, he’s taken nine shots and gone to the free throw line four times on his way to scoring 12 points. He’s also got at least three assists and four rebounds, so he’s creating even when he’s not scoring. And now he’s in his time—the second half.

4.) The Dutchmen are outsized down low but have displayed impressive toughness despite some early foul trouble for Greg Washington (three), David Imes (two) and Stephen Nwaukoni (two) and have minimized the second chances for Drexel. And Paul Bilbo hit his first career basket, a gorgeous sky hook in the waning seconds, in relief of Washington. The effort overall has been immeasurably better than five nights ago against Iona.

5.) Yves Jules has been huge on defense in helping the Dutchmen limit Chris Fouch to just one basket. Jules is an underrated player whose absence the last two weeks has hurt. But Fouch and the Dragons, who are shooting around 30 percent, will get hot at some point. Can the Dutchmen survive the inevitable run?

5b.) Someone other than Jenkins will need to hit a big dagger shot. Mike Moore had a quiet first half. Expect a couple big baskets from him in the second half.

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

Five pre-game thoughts: Drexel

1.) Meant to post this over the weekend or first thing this morning, but the Day Job weekend was, umm, no days at all. Hooray for that! Anyway, there’s a lot of people declaring the Flying Dutchmen are doomed after Wednesday’s ugly loss to Iona. I’m here to tell you we’ve seen far worse, and recently. For instance: At this time 104 weeks ago, the Dutchmen were about to get throttled by Northeastern in their second straight wire-to-wire loss to open real CAA play. I thought we were about to watch the worst Dutchmen team of the last 15 years. Instead, they finished 11-7 and 21-11. And last year? Do we need to remind you how bad last year looked at the midway point of the CAA season, and how things ended up? As I noted in today’s first post: The Dutchmen squeezed 21 wins two years ago out of a roster that featured a sophomore Charles Jenkins and very little else, so this is by no means beyond repair.

2.) The Iona loss was almost a good thing. Funny thing to say about the Dutchmen’s worst defeat at the hands of a mid-major in more than 10 years, but it’s true. Had the Dutchmen mounted a meaningless 29-12 run to end the game—as they did against Drexel when they bottomed out in January—then this just would have felt like a reasonably competitive loss against a better foe. It wasn’t. It was ugly, and the final margin only underlined how bad it really was. It was good to lose that game by 25 points, because it was a perfectly timed wakeup call for Mo Cassara as well as the entire roster. Efforts like the one the Dutchmen produced last Wednesday would get them blown out of the gym by Drexel tonight and George Mason Wednesday, and I wouldn’t even be able to scream about how Jim Larranaga is pouring it on (oh hi Mason Nation, how are you?). Better to get destroyed in a non-conference game that doesn’t matter a whit in the long run, and right before the games that count. Cassara ran the Dutchmen’s last four practices like boot camp to ensure this never happens again on his watch, and no matter what the result is tonight, the Dutchmen will look a lot better than they did against Iona.

3.) Strength vs. strength: As your good friend and mine Mike Litos noted today, Hofstra ranks 31st in the country in 3-point shooting while Drexel ranks first—king of the hill, numero uno, A Number One—in the nation in 3-point defense. Something’s got to give. For the Dutchmen’s sake, it better be Drexel’s defense, because the Dutchmen can’t match the Dragons’ fierceness under the boards (Drexel outrebounds opponents by almost 13 per game). Brad Kelleher and Shemiye McLendon can’t be 0-for-15 again.

4.) Weakness vs. weakness: Neither team is very deep, with the Dragons playing seven guys at least 22 minutes per game and their eighth less than seven minutes per game. The Dutchmen have a nine-man rotation, tops, but Cassara said Sunday the cold and flu viruses are still making their way through the Dutchmen, so who knows how deep they’ll be tonight. Drexel’s top seven has also been much more defined and proficient than Hofstra’s—the Dutchmen only have six players averaging as many as 22 minutes per game.

5.) The keys are keep it close, play good defense and hope for the game to be decided at the line. Pretty standard stuff, obviously, but if Dwan McMillan and Yves Jules are healthy, the Dutchmen will be far better off on defense than Wednesday against Iona, when the Gaels got uncontested shot after uncontested shot. One of Drexel’s few weaknesses, meanwhile, is at the free throw line, where the Dragons are shooting just 57 percent from the charity stripe. The Dutchmen will be in good shape to pull off the upset if they can keep it within a possession or two heading into the final media timeout.

Bonus thought.) Real curious to see how the new and more aggressive Jenkins fares. If he lives up to the advance billing, watch for Mike Moore to have a big game and for the Dutchmen to pull off the first CAA upset of the new year.

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.

And away we go!

POW! BAM! TO THE CAA TITLE! Get on the bus, Charles Jenkins is driving us to Monday night in Richmond!

Charles Jenkins, old soul, spent his final New Years Eve as a college basketball player alone in his room watching the annual “Honeymooners” marathon on Channel 11, a vision which generates the type of clichéd ledes we are doing our very best to ignore.

But ringing in 2011 in decidedly low-key fashion was an indicator of how focused Jenkins is on his last lap around the track, which begins in earnest tonight when the Dutchmen visit Drexel as CAA play resumes. The grand plan—Jenkins surrounded by experienced players as he tries to lead the Dutchmen to the NCAA Tournament as a senior—fell apart spectacularly last spring and summer, and the lopsided loss to Iona last Wednesday was the harshest reminder yet that the Dutchmen will only go as far as Jenkins can take them.

Jenkins alluded to as much after he took just three shots in the first half of the 87-62 pasting at the hands of Iona, saying he’ll never be passive in the first half again. Several days of rigorous, boot camp-like practices have only reinforced that belief for Jenkins and Mo Cassara alike. In fact, upon hearing Jenkins asked Sunday if he’s looking to take a game over from the opening tap, Cassara said “He better.”

That doesn’t mean playing 1-on-5, but the days of Jenkins sitting back and hoping the rest of the remarkably lean and inexperienced Dutchmen can mature on their own are over. Jenkins and fellow senior Greg Washington have played in a combined 209 games while the rest of the roster has combined to play in 139 games.

For the Dutchmen to contend, Jenkins has to be involved with every play. “Keep moving, be more aggressive—he’s got a target on his back now all the time,” Cassara said. “And the minute he stands or the minute he watches, he becomes guardable. When he’s moving and he’s on the move and we’re moving, he’s as tough a guy to guard as there is in the country.”

“Not necessarily selfish,” Jenkins said of his mindset. “Just more aggressive. My guys get more open shots when I’m aggressive. I create better plays for myself when I’m aggressive.”

Still, while Jenkins finally has a legitimate wingman in Mike Moore (17.3 ppg in December, up from 11.3 ppg in November) and possible 3-point specialists in Shemiye McLendon and Brad Kelleher (their 0-for-15 performance Wednesday notwithstanding) the hunch here is the more Jenkins scores, the better the Dutchmen will fare.

Keep this in mind: Jenkins begins play tonight 620 points shy of David Robinson, the leading scorer in CAA history. The closer he gets to breaking Robinson’s record (and he’d have to average 33 points per game in the 19 games the Dutchmen are guaranteed to play in order to surpass Robinson), the farther the Dutchmen get in March.

Whether he averages 33 or 23 the rest of the way, the honeymoon period is over for Jenkins (Booo! There’s that cliché) and the Dutchmen. With less than three months left in his career, it’s time for Jenkins to heed the advice of everyone from Cassara and Tom Pecora to Mike Jarvis and, at some level anyway, shed his unselfish ways and simply allow his talent to take over.

“This is my team,” Jenkins said. “I can’t be experimenting anymore, always saying that ‘we’re going to get better, we’re going to get better.’ We have to get better. Me being a senior, I have to have a sense of urgency, I have to be ready to attack and do whatever it takes night in and night out. And that’s something I plan on doing come conference play.”

***

So how will conference play turn out? I’ve long believed that at least one of the consensus top four—Old Dominion, VCU, James Madison and George Mason—would fall out and that Hofstra would slide in there and grab the ever-valuable first round bye. Since the CAA expanded in 2001-02, no team that played on Friday has won it all on Monday.

I can’t lie: I don’t feel as strongly about Hofstra grabbing that spot today as I did in November. Part of it is Drexel’s surprising preseason run. But the Dutchmen are even leaner now than we thought they’d be in October.

With Nathaniel Lester still sidelined and big men Roland Brown and Paul Bilbo and walk-on Matt Grogan seeing little time, everything has to go right just for the Dutchmen to have a nine-man rotation every night. And when players are sick (as Dwan McMillan and Yves Jules were Wednesday) and unable to hit water from a boat (as Kelleher and McLendon were Wednesday), well, it can get ugly, and visions of a 2007-08 replay—when the leading scorer in school history finished his career with a 12-18 season—begin dancing in my head.

But I am telling you, even if Hofstra doesn’t finish in the top four, I see Jenkins carrying the Dutchmen to the first Monday night of March and at least giving himself a shot to win that invitation to March Madness. He’s the best player, by far, in the conference, and the urgency of his senior season and the specter of his legacy will fuel him like never before. He needs some help: He needs Moore to continue channeling Norman Richardson, for Washington to begin his annual February surge tonight and for David Imes to shake off the first slump of his career. Jenkins also needs the Dutchmen to be the defensive team they were before Christmas, not afterward.

There will be some frightful moments along the way—hell, maybe even this week, with three tough games in six days. But if Jenkins could carry the incredibly flawed 2008-09 team to 21 wins, well, he can do even more here. See you in Richmond nine weeks from tonight. And maybe even thereafter.

Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch.